Navigation
« Recovering Marginal Effects and Standard Errors of Interactions Terms Pt. II: Implement and Visualize | Main | Spatial Tunnel Vision »
Monday
Mar052012

Recovering Marginal Effects and Standard Errors from Interaction Terms in R

When I fit models with interactions, I often want to recover not only the interaction effect but also the marginal effect (the main effect + the interaction) and of course the standard errors. There are a couple of ways to do this in R but I ended writing my own function (essentially a wrapper around the deltaMethod() function) to fit my needs.

In this case, I have a model where a continuous variable has been interacted with a discrete variable. I want to create a data.frame that stores the main effect, the marginal effects of the interactions, and their standard errors.

I also want the standard errors for the marginal effects on the interaction to match the standard errors on the main effect which in this case were HAC (Heteroskedastic and Autocorrelation Consistent ie. Newey-West).

The function below is a little sloppy as I built it iteratively while I was working through a specific problem, but it is generalized to any lm() type object. The basic use case is that you have one or more models, each with one or more interactions and the discrete terms in the interactions have more than two levels (it will work with two levels, but in that case the function might be overkill). In my case I fit a series of region specific panel models where two of the main effects were interacted with a year term. I wanted have a generalizable function where I could just feed it the model object, variable name, and covariance estimator, and then return a data.frame with estimates and standard errors. In the next post I'll demonstrate the function with simulated data and show how to visualize the marginal in ggplot.

 Note: The code below assumes you have already loaded car (for deltaMethod()), sandwich (for vcovHAC), and lmtest (for coeftest()).

 

##Calls this function which is a wrapper for coeftest from the sandwhich package
sehac<-function(fit,vcov=vcovHAC){ #Convenience function for HAC standard erros
	coeftest(fit,vcov)
}
 
funinteff<-function(mod,var,vcov=vcovHAC){ #mod is an lm() object, var is the name of the main effect that was interacted, vcov is the type of variance covariance method you want to use 
	#Extract Coefficient names create 'beta names' to feed to deltaMethod()
	cnames<-coef(mod)
	pnams<-data.frame('b'=paste('b',0:(length(cnames)-1),sep=""),'est'=cnames) #assign parameter names so that deltaMethod does not throw an error
 
	#Extract the specific parameters of interest
	vars<-grep(var,names(cnames),value=T)
	var1<-vars[1]
	intvars<-vars[2:length(vars)]
	bi<-pnams[var1,'b']
 
	#--Create Data Frame to store Main Effect
	int<-sehac(mod,vcov=vcov)[var1,c('Estimate','Std. Error')]
	int<-as.data.frame(t(int))
	names(int)<-c('Estimate','SE')
	row.names(int)<-var1
 
	#Loop through and store the results in a data.frame
	for(i in 1:length(intvars)){
		bint<-pnams[intvars[i],'b']
		eq<-paste(bi,bint,sep="+")
		interac<-deltaMethod(mod,eq,parameterNames=pnams[,1],vcov=vcov)
		row.names(interac)<-intvars[i]
 
		int<-rbind(int,interac)
	}
	return(int)
}

Created by Pretty R at inside-R.org

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: this contact form
    Great page, Keep up the fantastic work. With thanks.
  • Response
    - Frank Davenport's Research Blog - Recovering Marginal Effects and Standard Errors from Interaction Terms in R
  • Response
    Response: xovilichter
    - Frank Davenport's Research Blog - Recovering Marginal Effects and Standard Errors from Interaction Terms in R

Reader Comments (1)

Dear Frank,

I found your script to be very interesting and potentialy helpful. Anyway, I was wondering if you now any similar workaround for lmrob models? Using robust regression is going increasingly popular, but we still lack good options to calculate marginal effects for them, leaving interpretations of robust models somewhat in the dark. Thanks a ton!

April 12, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRichard

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>